Track the frontier, from condensed matter to cosmology.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
To evaluate cross-tenant privacy risks in shared quantum infrastructure, the authors formulate an information-theoretic leakage metric based on quantum state distinguishability and benchmark it across commercial 156-qubit IBM and 20-qubit IQM processors. They discover that standard reported average gate errors fail to reflect cross-talk security because they cannot differentiate between coherent and stochastic error channels, allowing partitions with identical error rates to exhibit wildly disparate leakage. Although whole-register uniform Pauli randomization can theoretically eliminate this leakage, experimental results show that accumulated gate overhead causes non-trivial fidelity degradation, underscoring the need for hardware-level coherence reporting.
Standard gate error benchmarks are blind to quantum side-channels: two co-tenancy boundaries with identical reported error rates can leak vastly different amounts of tenant data depending on the coherence of the underlying noise.
Multi-tenant computing enables providers of commercial cloud quantum processors to rent disjoint sectors of a device to independent users. Average gate error, which cloud quantum computing providers report, does not determine how much one tenant learns about another. We propose an information-theoretic notion of information leakage across co-tenancy boundaries stemming from quantum state distinguishability. We measure this leakage on commercially-available 156-qubit (IBM Kingston) and 20-qubit (IQM Garnet) devices. Boundaries with identical benchmarked error can offer significantly different amount of information leakage because standard reported measures of error are blind to coherent-versus-stochastic nature of the error while the proposed notion of information leakage is not. A uniform Pauli randomisation implemented over the victim's whole register is used as a defence mechanism to reduce the information leakage to zero. The defence theoretically does not incur a fidelity cost, but the experiments show a non-trivial degradation caused by accumulation of errors. We provide a specific call-for-action to the providers of quantum cloud computing to report information leakage in addition to standard error rates in their device datasheet to enable users to compute privacy and security risks prior to engagement with the device.