Track the frontier, from condensed matter to cosmology.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This comment identifies a fatal projection error in Muru et al.'s analysis of Fermi-LAT Galactic Center Excess (GCE) morphologies from the HESTIA cosmological simulations. By plotting the square of the line-of-sight mass integral $[\int \rho s^2 ds]^2$ instead of the true dark matter annihilation integral $\int \rho^2 ds$, the original authors artificially preserved linear density isophotes that mimicked old stellar populations. Evaluating the corrected annihilation integral on the exact same simulation suite reveals that dark matter annihilation and stellar morphology predictions remain observationally distinct, overturning the original claim of indistinguishability.
A basic integration error—squaring the mass projection instead of integrating density squared—falsely led physicists to conclude that dark matter annihilation is morphologically indistinguishable from stellar emission at the Galactic Center.
Muru et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 161005 (2025)] conclude from the HESTIA constrained simulations that the $γ$-ray morphologies of the Galactic Center Excess predicted by dark matter annihilation and by an old stellar population are essentially indistinguishable. Their "quadratic dark matter" maps, however, show the square of the mass projected along the line of sight, $\bigl[\intρ\,s^{2}\,ds\bigr]^{2}$, rather than the annihilation integral $\intρ^{2}\,ds$. Squaring a nonnegative map preserves its isophote shapes at corresponding intensity levels, as confirmed by the reported contour axis ratios. The corrected calculation on the same simulations does not support their conclusion.