Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper establishes that the aggregation with exponential weights (AEW) estimator achieves minimax-rate optimality in expectation for model selection aggregation with squared loss, resolving a long-standing question in the field. The authors demonstrate that AEW attains an excess risk of \(T \log (M) / (n+1)\) without needing a Bernstein-type assumption, provided the temperature \(T\) meets specific conditions related to the distribution of the data. Notably, they identify a sharp phase transition in AEW's performance, confirming that it is suboptimal for lower temperatures while optimal for sufficiently high, constant temperatures.
AEW achieves optimal performance in expectation for model selection aggregation, revealing a critical phase transition that could redefine its application in statistical learning.
The aggregation with exponential weights (AEW) estimator is not fully understood in the basic setting of model selection aggregation with squared loss. In particular, whether it is minimax-rate optimal in expectation for large enough fixed temperatures and under random design has been an open problem since its introduction, which was explicitly posed by Lecu\'{e} and Mendelson (2013). In this paper, we settle this problem by showing that \emph{without} requiring a Bernstein-type assumption, the AEW indeed achieves the excess risk $T \log (M) / (n+1)$ in expectation, whenever the temperature $T$ satisfies $(L^2/T)\exp(B/T)\leq \mu /2$. Here, the number of dictionary elements is $M$, the estimator has observed $n$ i.i.d. samples from any distribution, and the loss is assumed to be bounded by $B$, $L$-Lipschitz continuous and $\mu$-strongly convex. For squared loss, we show that $T\geq 4 b^2$ suffices when the predictions and labels are $[0,b]$-valued. Because AEW is known to be suboptimal in expectation for temperatures below some constant, this shows that AEW has a sharp phase transition when the temperature is large enough but constant, as conjectured by Lecu\'{e} and Mendelson.