Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces Microlensify, a transformer-based variational autoencoder designed to classify microlensing events using TESS light curves. By analyzing approximately 5.6 million light curves, the model successfully identifies microlensing candidates and distinguishes them from false positives, achieving a high accuracy of R虏 = 0.97 in predicting event durations. The findings highlight the model's robustness across various survey cadences, confirming 92.7% accuracy on published microlensing events from ground-based surveys.
Microlensify can accurately classify microlensing events with a staggering 92.7% success rate, revealing new insights into faint compact object populations.
Microlensing can reveal populations of faint compact objects that are otherwise difficult to detect. Depending on their design, all-sky surveys have the potential to search for these objects across the sky. The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), primarily designed to detect transiting exoplanets, also provides near all-sky coverage with high cadence. In this work, we use TESS data to search for microlensing candidates using both traditional and machine-learning methods and to identify associated false positives in high-cadence surveys. Microlensify is a physics-informed, transformer-based variational autoencoder trained on simulated single-lens microlensing light curves and real TESS Sector 12 data. The model classifies events, reconstructs light curves, and estimates microlensing event durations. Applied to $\sim 5.6$ million TESS light curves, it identified between $0.036\%$ and $1.89\%$ as microlensing candidates across different TESS pipelines. After applying microlensing detection metrics and cross-matching with SIMBAD, we obtained a final list of candidates and identified false positives including long-period variables, Mira variables, cataclysmic variables, red giants, and transients. We also found Gaussian-like peaks caused by asteroid crossings, a potential source of false positives in high-cadence microlensing surveys. The model also predicts event duration with an accuracy of $R^2 = 0.97$. The model was further tested on published events from different ground-based microlensing surveys, confirming 92.7% as microlensing, demonstrating its applicability across surveys with different cadences.