Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critically examines the limitations of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) lemma in preserving geometric properties of high-dimensional data through random projections. It reveals that while the JL bound guarantees distance preservation, it can be misleading as it does not account for the concentration of distances and the geometric information that exists in smaller fluctuations. The authors derive a closed-form expression for the singular values of the optimal decoder, showing that a rank-$m$ sketch retains only an $m/d$ fraction of the variance of any feature of squared distances, indicating that JL distance preservation does not adequately reflect the geometry necessary for effective comparison or inference.
The JL lemma may assure distance preservation, but it fails to capture the essential geometric nuances needed for accurate data analysis in high dimensions.
The Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) lemma guarantees that a random projection of $n$ points to $m=O(\varepsilon^{-2}\log n)$ dimensions preserves pairwise squared distances within relative error $\varepsilon$ with high probability, and this dimension order is asymptotically optimal. In high dimensions, however, distances concentrate around a baseline while key geometric information lies in much smaller fluctuations. We show that the JL bound can therefore be uninformative about retained geometry: an independent Gaussian replacement map can satisfy it even though the replacement cloud is independent of the original data. We then ask how well any decoder can recover a feature $f(D)$ of a squared distance $D$ from a linear sketch. Under squared-error loss, the optimal decoder is conditional expectation, so recovery defines a linear operator whose singular values quantify feature recovery. For isotropic Gaussian data ($\Sigma=\sigma^2 I_d$), we diagonalize this operator in closed form. For fixed $k$ with $m,d-m\to\infty$, its $k$th singular value satisfies $\ell_k\approx(m/ d)^{k/2}$. This yields three sharp consequences. A rank-$m$ sketch retains at most an $m/d$ fraction of the variance of any feature of one squared distance. If $m\to\infty$ and $m/d\to0$, the expected Kendall correlation is $\frac{2}{\pi}\sqrt{m/d}(1+o(1))$; for fixed $q$, nearest- neighbor agreement tends to $1/q$. Yet one projection can satisfy the JL bound while mean Kendall correlation vanishes when $\log n\ll m\ll d$. After removing scale, Haar-averaged retained covariance-shape information is $(m/d)^2$. Thus JL distance preservation does not quantify the geometry available for comparison or inference.
