Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
To address retrieval degradation and stale-fact interference in unbounded agent memory, Fortunate Recall establishes an infrastructure-agnostic policy layer that maps facts into a 10+1 behavioral ontology to govern differential temporal decay, slot-key supersession, and event-time validity. A pre-registered ablation demonstrates that while generic lifecycle primitives drive core correctness gains, the fine-grained behavioral ontology specifically drives model calibration, cutting confabulation rates in half. The resulting system, FR-Bank, achieves 76.9% on LifecycleBench (outperforming Mem0, A-MEM, and MemoryOS) and slashes Mem0's query confabulation from 45.1% to 22.4% without degrading performance on standard benchmarks like LongMemEval-S.
Fine-grained memory lifecycle policies cut downstream agent confabulation in half, proving that the key bottleneck in long-term LLM coherence is not retrieval capacity, but deterministic, category-aware fact supersession.
Current LLM memory systems treat all personal facts identically, so stores grow without bound while retrieval precision degrades. The core challenge is lifecycle management: which memories should persist, which should be replaced, and at what rate, conditioned on the behavioral type of each fact. Fortunate Recall (FR) is a composable policy layer that classifies personal facts into a 10+1 behavioral ontology and applies category-specific lifecycle policies (differential temporal decay, slot-key supersession, event-time validity, and category-aware retrieval routing) as deterministic functions over LLM-extracted metadata. FR-Bank, our infrastructure-independent implementation, reaches a 76.9% pass rate on LifecycleBench, a new 516-question temporal-disambiguation benchmark, ahead of Mem0, A-MEM, Memory-R1, and MemoryOS (61% to 70.5%), and 75.2% on the full LongMemEval-S under the canonical Wu et al. judge protocol, so lifecycle policies impose no measurable cost on standard retrieval. A pre-registered ablation locates the gains: replacing the typed layer with three generic lifecycle primitives leaves correctness statistically unchanged (-1.7pp, 95% CI [-6.0, +2.7]), so the generic lifecycle metadata carries the correctness advantage, while the behavioral ontology carries calibration, halving downstream confabulation (12.0% vs 24.2%, p<0.001). End-to-end, FR-Bank cuts confabulation from Mem0's 45.1% to 22.4% over answered queries and from 32.2% to 13.0% over all queries while answering more of them correctly (31.2% vs 18.6%); the ranking replicates on the open-weight Kimi K2.5. The decomposition transfers to BEAM, an independently built benchmark: 46.8% correct vs Mem0's 32.9% over 280 questions, with the ontology's benefit concentrated in contradiction resolution and saturating near seven policy clusters. The ontology, benchmark, and code are released.
