Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
OmniMed-FL evaluates multimodal federated learning across 3 to 20 simulated hospital clients using a proxy corpus of 3,000 chest radiographs paired with synthetic clinical text. The benchmark systematically analyzes eight fusion strategies, missing-modality imputation schemes, and federated optimizers under severe non-IID Dirichlet partitions. Multimodal fusion reliably beats unimodal baselines鈥攔eaching 0.956 macro-F1 versus 0.934 for text and 0.664 for vision鈥攖hough non-IID label skew drives severe performance degradation (up to 0.27 F1) while client communication scales linearly to 183.5 GiB.
Extreme label skew degrades federated multimodal performance nearly three times more than a sevenfold increase in participating clients, exposing data heterogeneity rather than network scale as the primary failure mode for decentralized clinical AI.
Simultaneous assessment of medical imaging and patient records is often required in clinical diagnosis. However, standard machine learning algorithms cannot analyze these data types together. Meanwhile, compliance with HIPAA and GDPR can constrain centralized aggregation of sensitive patient data. This leaves a crucial void of secure fusion of visual and textual context across distant networks. Thus, we present OmniMed-FL, a controlled systems study of multimodal federated learning for five-class clinical condition classification (Normal, Pneumonia, COVID-19, Pleural Effusion, Cardiomegaly). Our proxy corpus pairs 3,000 public chest radiographs with 3,000 class-conditioned synthetic notes, matched by class, not by patient. The framework benchmarks eight fusion strategies, three initializations, four missing-text imputation rules, and matched federated baselines under non-IID Dirichlet partitioning across 3 to 20 hospital clients. As all notes are synthetic and pairing is not patient-level, these are descriptive proxy comparisons, not estimates of diagnostic performance or deployment readiness. Within those limits with clients ($K=5$) and severe skew ($伪=0.1$), local-only training achieves a macro-F1 score of 0.297, FedAvg achieves $0.662\pm0.074$, FedProx $0.737\pm0.085$, a matched FedMME-style one-shot ensemble $0.647\pm0.080$, and our SCAFFOLD-AdamW adaptation $0.070\pm0.015$, the 0.075 FedProx-FedAvg gap falling inside the wider of the two two-seed standard deviations. Over a $4\times3$ grid, label skew costs up to 0.27 F1 whereas a near-sevenfold client increase costs at most 0.10, while bidirectional volume grows linearly to 183.5 GiB at $K=20$. Multimodal fusion leads on both corpora, scoring 0.956 against 0.934 for text and 0.664 for images on the synthetic corpus and 0.906 against 0.880 and 0.737 on the radiograph corpus, for $2.3\times$ the model state of text alone.
