Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates distributed one-dimensional mean estimation under 1-bit communication constraints and bounded $k$-th central moments ($k > 1$), resolving whether central-learner adaptivity is required to achieve optimal convergence rates. The authors prove that a fully non-adaptive protocol matches the adaptive 1-bit minimax rate and establish the exact sample complexity when query support is restricted to at most $s$ intervals. Their findings characterize a fundamental sample-interval tradeoff, revealing an additive $(位蟽/(s\varepsilon^2))\log(1/未)$ sample penalty for simple interval-constrained queries.
Interactive communication yields zero minimax advantage in 1-bit distributed mean estimation: purely non-adaptive queries match the adaptive rate for any heavy-tailed moment condition $k > 1$.
We study distributed one-dimensional mean estimation under a 1-bit communication constraint. Each agent observes one sample, drawn independently from an unknown distribution, and returns a single bit in response to a query $Q: \mathbb{R}\to\{0,1\}$ chosen by a central learner. The distribution has mean in $[-位,位]$ and $k$-th central moment at most $蟽^k$, for a fixed $k>1$. The order-optimal two-stage protocol of Lau and Scarlett uses responses from the first batch to choose the second-batch queries, motivating the question of whether this single round of interaction is necessary. We answer this negatively: for every $k>1$, a non-adaptive protocol attains the adaptive 1-bit minimax rate (and concurrent works reached the same conclusion via different strategies). We further determine the minimax sample complexity among non-adaptive 1-bit estimators when every one-set $Q^{-1}(1)$ is restricted to a union of at most $s$ intervals. Relative to unrestricted non-adaptive 1-bit querying, this constraint adds a term of order $(位蟽/(s\varepsilon^2))\log(1/未)$, giving the full tradeoff between sample complexity and interval complexity to within $k$-dependent constant factors. As a corollary, we identify, order-wise, the minimum interval budget needed to retain the unrestricted 1-bit minimax sample rate.