Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
To bypass the prohibitive compute costs of training native probabilistic weather models, this work investigates whether calibrated ensemble forecasts can be extracted directly from existing deterministic checkpoints (Aurora, GraphCast, SFNO, and AIFS) via inference-time weight perturbations. Across 112 initialization cycles, these stochastically perturbed weight (SPW) ensembles come within 0.04 to 0.13 CRPSS of fully trained probabilistic baselines at 10-day lead times at zero marginal training cost. The authors find that optimal noise injection sites are strictly architecture-dependent and prone to whole-field mean biases unless mitigated by coarse-scale noise restriction or initial condition perturbations.
Deterministic weather models can match dedicated probabilistic ensembles within 0.04–0.13 CRPSS at a 10-day lead time simply by perturbing raw network weights at inference without any retraining.
Machine-learning weather models (MLWMs) now match or outperform operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) at global medium-range forecasting, at far lower inference cost. Many deployed MLWMs are deterministic, producing a single forecast with no estimate of its own uncertainty, whereas a growing family of trained-probabilistic models generate calibrated ensembles directly, at the price of a dedicated training run. We ask instead how much uncertainty can be extracted from a deterministic checkpoint that already exists, without retraining it. Where physical ensembles represent model uncertainty by stochastically perturbing parametrisation tendencies, we perturb the network's raw weight tensors at inference time, a scheme we call stochastically perturbed weights (SPW). We also ask whether it works, where and on which scales to inject the noise, and where it fails. A three-phase ablation across four deterministic backbones, Aurora, GraphCast, SFNO, and AIFS, selects one production baseline per model, benchmarked against the trained-probabilistic AIFS-ENS, FourCastNet 3 and Atlas as well as the operational ECMWF ensemble (IFS-ENS) over 112 initialisation times. At a 240 h (10-day) lead time the SPW ensembles reach continuous ranked probability skill scores (CRPSS) between 0.04 and 0.13 below the best trained-probabilistic baseline, at zero marginal training cost. No injection site works across models: the productive tensor group is architecture-specific, so SPW is at present a tuning procedure rather than a plug-and-play recipe. Its main failure mode is a coherent whole-field offset that overdisperses the domain mean, and restricting the noise to coarse scales or perturbing the initial conditions each repair part of it.
ETH