Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
To mitigate catastrophic utility collapse under mass deletion, CUNO organizes graph unlearning into a progressive curriculum that removes nodes ordered by estimated unlearning difficulty. Unlike existing methods that apply uniform forgetting across heterogeneous graph topologies, this framework prevents representational collapse by optimizing a distribution-level negative preference optimization (NPO) objective across sequential stages to cleanly excise targeted behaviors while preserving retained utility. Under a 20% mass deletion ratio, CUNO preserves 74% of downstream model utility compared to just 26–53% for prevailing baselines, and sustains over half of original utility even under extreme 50% deletion.
Treating all deleted nodes uniformly causes catastrophic utility collapse in graph unlearning, but ordering removals by topological difficulty retains 74% performance at 20% mass deletion where prior baselines plummet to 26%.
Graph unlearning removes the influence of designated training data from a trained graph model without retraining from scratch. However, existing methods suffer a sharp drop in model utility under large deletion ratios (mass deletion), a phenomenon we refer to as catastrophic unlearning. We find that a key cause is the uniform treatment of all deleted samples, which is particularly damaging in graph learning: structural dependencies cause different nodes to play vastly different roles in the learned model, yet existing methods apply the same forgetting operation to the entire forget set. Based on this insight, we propose CUNO, a curriculum-based graph unlearning framework that removes the forget set progressively, ordering samples by their estimated unlearning difficulty across multiple stages. CUNO further employs a distribution-level negative preference optimization (NPO) objective at each curriculum stage that steers the model away from its original behavior on the current forget subset while preserving retained performance. Our theoretical analysis shows that the curriculum design is most beneficial when the forget set spans a wide range of unlearning difficulty, a condition naturally satisfied under mass deletion. Comprehensive experiments confirm that CUNO consistently mitigates catastrophic unlearning: at 20% deletion, it retains 74% of the original utility compared to 26-53% for existing methods, and maintains more than half the original utility even at 50% deletion. Our code is publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/cuno-D4FF.
