Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper conducts an empirical analysis of emerging open-source software (OSS) contribution guidelines and documentation regulating AI-mediated code, issue reports, and reviews. As generative models drive the marginal cost of contribution generation toward zero, maintainers face critical disruptions in assessing contributor effort, legal liability, and review authenticity. The authors synthesize these findings into the AI Contribution Governance Framework, mapping recurring institutional concerns鈥攃hiefly preserving scarce maintainer attention and accountability鈥攖o concrete governance mechanisms.
Maintainers are fundamentally restructuring OSS governance rules to defend scarce human attention against asymmetric floods of low-effort, AI-generated pull requests.
Artificial intelligence is reshaping open source software (OSS) contribution by lowering the cost of producing code, documentation, issue reports, and review interactions. This creates opportunities for broader participation, but also disrupts how maintainers assess contributor effort, competence, and accountability. In response, OSS projects are beginning to regulate AI-mediated contribution through contribution guidelines and other project documentation. This paper presents an empirical study of these emerging policies. We analyze project policies on AI-mediated contributions by evaluating their underlying rationales, rules, and expectations. Our analysis shows that these policies seek to protect scarce maintainer attention, preserve accountability, sustain meaningful review interactions, address legal and quality concerns, and maintain pathways for newcomer learning. Based on these findings, we introduce the AI Contribution Governance Framework, which organizes recurring concerns and governance mechanisms across projects. The framework helps OSS communities develop AI contribution policies and provides researchers with a vocabulary for studying how AI is changing collaborative software production.
