Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a unified decision framework for proactive service agents, emphasizing the need for agents to infer service opportunities from incomplete signals rather than relying solely on explicit user instructions. By formulating the decision-making process as a partially observable sequential decision process, the authors highlight the importance of timing, content, and delivery in agent actions while addressing challenges such as interruption and privacy concerns. The study organizes existing methods into a comprehensive decision pipeline and establishes metrics that reveal the limitations of offline classification performance in predicting real-world deployment benefits, ultimately demonstrating that effective proactivity hinges on calibrated intervention value and verifiable authorization.
Proactive service agents can significantly enhance user experience by inferring needs and acting before explicit instructions are given, transforming the interaction paradigm.
Large language model agents can plan, invoke tools, and modify external states, yet most systems still take an explicit user instruction as a fixed starting point. Proactive service moves the decision upstream: an agent must infer service opportunities from incomplete environmental and user signals, choose among remaining silent, asking, assisting, and acting, and account for interruption, misunderstanding, overreach, and privacy costs. This survey gives an operational definition centered on initiative and formulates the problem as a partially observable sequential decision process constrained by authorization and risk. The formulation represents timing, content, and delivery within one structured action, while making explicit the option value of waiting, the decision value of questions, and feedback-induced state changes. On this basis, we organize existing methods along one decision pipeline (state and need estimation, intervention gating, action construction, and feedback adaptation) and describe prescribed, predictive, model based, and return optimizing mechanisms as nonexclusive policy-construction components. We further normalize decision units and three-axis evidence descriptors across streaming dialogue, screen, video, software-engineering, and human-agent collaboration resources, and formalize metrics for triggering, timing, calibration, user burden, safety, and policy value. The synthesis shows why offline classification performance alone does not predict deployment benefit and why long-term memory is not a defining condition of proactivity. Reliable proactive service instead requires calibrated incremental intervention value, verifiable authorization, recoverable execution, and counterfactual evidence.
