Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper details a comprehensive specialization pipeline for large language models aimed at excelling in competitive programming, utilizing a combination of problem curation, synthetic reasoning traces, supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and reinforcement learning (RL). The authors trained two models, Nemotron-3-Nano-CC and Nemotron-3-Ultra-CC, achieving remarkable performance improvements, with Nano-CC surpassing the gold threshold in IOI 2025 and Ultra-CC achieving an impressive score in IOI 2026 that outperformed the top human contestant. The introduction of GenCorrect, a feedback-driven strategy for generating and refining solutions, played a crucial role in enhancing the models' performance during competitions.
Achieving a score of 535.4, the Ultra-CC model not only surpassed the gold threshold but also outperformed the highest-scoring human contestant in competitive programming for the first time.
Competitive programming has become a key test of large language model reasoning, with international competitions such as IOI and ICPC representing its most challenging settings. We present an end-to-end specialization pipeline combining large-scale problem curation, synthetic reasoning traces, supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and reinforcement learning (RL). Using 22,000 curated problems, we train Nemotron-3-Nano-CC (30B-A3B) with SFT and RL and Nemotron-3-Ultra-CC (550B-A55B) with SFT alone. We further introduce GenCorrect, a feedback-driven test-time compute strategy that iteratively generates, evaluates, and refines diverse solutions. On IOI 2025, Nano-CC improves from 130 points to 291 after post-training and to 468 with GenCorrect, exceeding the gold threshold of 438.3 while Ultra-CC reaches 502. Guided by these results, we develop a competition-specific Ultra-CC system and evaluate it prospectively during IOI 2026. Under the same time, internet-access, and submission constraints as human contestants, it scores 535.4 out of 600, exceeding both the gold threshold of 361.12 and the top human score of 498.27. To our knowledge, this is the first AI system to outscore the highest-scoring human contestant on an IOI problem set.
