Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces AICOME, a framework that leverages AI to derive respondent-level measures of social and occupational characteristics, enabling the recovery of individual and group-level effects in contextual models. By validating AICOME against the 2022 China Family Panel Studies, the researchers demonstrate that AI-derived measures can effectively replicate the associations found in traditional survey data, particularly highlighting the strong correlation between weekly hours worked and job satisfaction. The results indicate that while AICOME can capture significant contextual information, its effectiveness diminishes when data is limited to basic demographics and occupation alone.
AI-derived measures can recover critical individual and group-level effects, challenging the traditional reliance on survey data for social and occupational insights.
Researchers increasingly use artificial intelligence to construct measures of social, organizational, and occupational characteristics that are absent from conventional surveys. We propose AICOME, AI COntextual MEasurement, a framework for evaluating whether AI-derived respondent-level measures can recover individual and group-level effects in contextual models. The key idea is that an AI measure constructed at the respondent level can be used to derive its group-level aggregate and its individual deviation, allowing researchers to estimate both between-group and within-group associations rather than treating AI measurement as response prediction alone. We validate the framework using the 2022 China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), where occupations provide the empirical grouping structure and several job-related survey variables provide validation benchmarks. For computer use, foreign-language use, weekly hours, and management responsibilities, we compare survey measures with AI-derived measures in response-level, model-level, contextual, and boundary-condition validations. The results show that AI contextual measurement can recover much of the contextual-model information contained in observed survey variables when rich respondent and job characteristics are available. Weekly hours provides the strongest validation case, with AI-derived measures reproducing the large negative between- and within-occupation associations with satisfaction observed in CFPS. The framework also identifies clear boundary conditions: performance deteriorates when information is restricted to occupation and basic demographics, and recovery is weaker when several related concepts are treated as simultaneously unobserved. The findings suggest that AICOME is most useful for recovering a limited number of theoretically important constructs from rich existing datasets.
