Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the Proxy-to-Decision Transfer (PDT) Framework, which rigorously evaluates the effectiveness of future-aware representations in autonomous driving planners by analyzing proposal ordering and trajectory selection. The framework's Decision-Transfer Decomposition Module quantifies value loss and utility discrepancies, while the Reliability-Constrained Validation Module ensures robust validation of performance claims. The results reveal that while some configurations show marginal improvements, many fail to meet robustness criteria, highlighting the limitations of current evaluation methods in autonomous driving systems.
The PDT Framework uncovers critical gaps in decision-making reliability for future-aware autonomous driving planners, revealing that many touted improvements may not withstand rigorous scrutiny.
Future-aware representations and world models are increasingly used in proposal-based autonomous-driving planners to improve trajectory selection. However, improvements in proxy objectives or restricted subsets are often interpreted as planning gains without verifying proposal ordering, selected trajectories, full-scale utility, and critical driving components. We propose the Proxy-to-Decision Transfer (PDT) Framework, an analysis framework that evaluates when learned future information supports a reliable driving-performance improvement claim. Its Decision-Transfer Decomposition Module localizes value loss through score margins, switch-conditioned utility, and support-versus-selection regret. Its Reliability-Constrained Validation Module requires exact pairing, a minimum meaningful effect, scale-expanded confirmation, safety non-compensation, sequential comparability, and family-level robustness. On a representative future-aware planner evaluated with NAVSIM-v1, component BCE decreases from 0.705 to 0.530 while held selected PDM decreases from 0.963 to 0.961. A separate candidate improves a 512-record prefix by 0.00909, with a scene-bootstrap 95% interval of [0.000744, 0.0177], but its 2048-record and complete-support intervals include zero. A proposal-level replay further confirms the switch-utility decomposition, yet none of 432 screened configurations passes the two-half, two-seed robustness gate. PDT therefore identifies where decision transfer fails or remains indeterminate across proxy, subset, aggregate, and selection evidence.
