Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the ICE-T framework, which combines intermodal transfer, computational thinking, and explanatory thinking to enhance machine learning education and foster trust in AI systems. By addressing the opacity of ML tools, the framework aims to deepen learners' understanding and promote calibrated trust in AI applications. The authors argue that integrating these educational facets can effectively drive appropriate reliance on AI technologies, making trust calibration a key educational objective.
Trust in AI can be systematically cultivated through a structured educational framework that demystifies machine learning.
Machine learning (ML) education faces two persistent and connected obstacles: many educational tools present ML as an opaque black box, which leaves learners with a superficial understanding, and this same opacity prevents users from forming the calibrated trust that appropriate reliance on AI systems requires. We present ICE-T, a didactic framework that integrates three mutually reinforcing facets: intermodal transfer grounded in Bruner's enactive, iconic, and symbolic modes of representation, computational thinking operationalized through the Use-Modify-Create progression, and explanatory thinking supported by a process model. Connecting the framework to the empirical literature on algorithm aversion, AI literacy, and mental model formation, and to systematic reviews of the K-12 ML activity landscape, we argue that the three facets supply the cognitive mechanisms that the trust calibration literature identifies as drivers of appropriate reliance: representational richness, graduated process control, and the capacity to contextualize errors. On this basis, we propose that trust calibration be treated as an explicit educational objective, with ICE-T as a principled and scalable means of achieving it.
