Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces PolERo, a dataset comprising 3,574 annotated question-answer pairs from Romanian presidential transcripts, aimed at studying political evasion in responses. The authors evaluate various classification methods, including TF-IDF baselines and fine-tuned encoder models, while exploring cross-lingual transfer through bilingual training and machine translation. Key findings reveal that fine-tuned encoders perform competitively, but challenges persist with ambivalent evasion categories that rely on pragmatic cues, highlighting the complexities of political discourse across languages.
Fine-tuned encoders reveal unexpected asymmetries in cross-lingual transfer, exposing the nuanced challenges of political evasion in Romanian discourse.
Political evasion refers to responses that engage with a question while withholding the requested information. Recent NLP work frames political evasion as a classification task using a two-level taxonomy of response clarity and fine-grained evasion strategies. Existing work on response clarity and evasion classification is limited to English, leaving open whether the taxonomy and model behavior transfer across languages and political contexts. We introduce PolERo, a dataset of 3,574 human-annotated question-answer pairs extracted from official transcripts of five Romanian presidents. We evaluate multiple classification approaches on both datasets under matched conditions, including TF-IDF baselines, fine-tuned encoder models, a proposed sliding-window encoder, and zero/few-shot LLM prompting. We study cross-lingual transfer through joint bilingual training and machine-translation-based data augmentation. Our results indicate that fine-tuned encoders are competitive, cross-lingual transfer is asymmetric, and ambivalent evasion categories involving pragmatic cues remain the main challenge across all model families.
