Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper identifies a critical issue in the training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) known as Gradient-Update Mismatch (GUM), where the conflict-free property of gradients constructed via gradient surgery is often lost after optimization. The authors propose a novel method called Gradient-Update Alignment (GUA) that projects optimizer proposals onto a conflict-free cone, ensuring that updates remain conflict-free and significantly enhancing the performance of existing gradient surgery techniques. Experimental results demonstrate that GUA can reduce the relative \(L_2\) error by up to 98.2% across various PINN configurations, highlighting its effectiveness in addressing the GUM problem.
Conflict rates in modern optimizers can reach up to 86.3%, but a new alignment technique can ensure updates remain conflict-free, drastically improving training outcomes.
Training Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) requires jointly optimizing physics residual and initial/boundary condition loss terms, which often induce conflicting gradients. Gradient surgery methods mitigate this issue by constructing directions from loss-specific gradients to reduce conflict before optimizer transformation. However, even when the constructed direction is conflict-free, this property may not be preserved after optimizer transformation. Let $a_t$ denote the direction constructed by gradient surgery, $u_t$ the optimizer proposal, and $\mathcal{C}_t$ the conflict-free cone induced by the loss-specific gradients. We show that modern optimizers can transform $a_t$ through mechanisms such as historical state, adaptive scaling, preconditioning, or decoupled weight decay, so $a_t \in \mathcal{C}_t$ does not generally imply $u_t \in \mathcal{C}_t$. We refer to this optimizer-induced discrepancy in conflict-freeness between $a_t$ and $u_t$ as Gradient-Update Mismatch (GUM). Accordingly, we propose Gradient-Update Alignment (GUA), which projects $u_t$ onto $\mathcal{C}_t$ to obtain the aligned update $p_t$ and applies $p_t$ to the parameters. When the optimizer maintains internal state, GUA further adjusts this state toward targets reconstructed from the applied update. We conduct extensive experiments and find that GUM is widespread across momentum, adaptive, and curvature-based optimizers, with conflict rates reaching up to 86.3%. Across all PINN settings, GUA achieves conflict-free applied updates and consistently improves various gradient surgery methods, reducing the relative $L_2$ error by up to 98.2% in individual settings. Data and code are available at https://github.com/JingXiao10/GUA.
