Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study rigorously evaluates the robustness of responsible-AI benchmarks when subjected to various efficiency-enhancing techniques, such as batching and quantization. By assessing three dense and mixture-of-experts models across multiple conditions, the authors reveal that while larger batching maintains accuracy close to baseline levels, INT4 quantization introduces significant variability in model performance. The findings underscore the necessity of validating the conclusions drawn from efficient evaluations, as they can significantly impact assessments of accuracy, bias, and reasoning quality.
Efficient evaluation methods can drastically alter the conclusions drawn about model behavior, revealing hidden vulnerabilities in AI benchmarking.
Efficient evaluation changes the protocol used to support claims about model behavior, yet it is rarely tested whether those claims remain stable after the evaluation itself is made cheaper. We stress-test conclusion robustness in responsible-AI benchmarking by evaluating three dense and mixture-of-experts models on BBQ and BBQ-V under seven conditions spanning batching, quantization, benchmark reduction, and their combinations. Rather than treating preserved aggregate accuracy as sufficient, we compare accuracy, bias severity and prevalence, reasoning quality, subgroup behavior, subset-membership stability, runtime, and measured GPU energy against a full-benchmark BF16 baseline. Larger batching keeps accuracy within 0.35 percentage points of baseline and produces comparatively small subgroup changes, while reducing energy in five of six model--dataset settings. INT8 largely preserves quality but uses 1.79--4.26$\times$ baseline energy. INT4 causes larger, model- and context-dependent changes. Reduced benchmarks provide the most consistent savings, but very small subsets are substantially more sensitive to which items are retained. Efficient evaluation should therefore be treated as a measurement intervention whose validity must be checked across the conclusions the benchmark is intended to support. Our project website is https://vectorinstitute.github.io/sustainable-rai-evaluation/ and the code is available at https://github.com/VectorInstitute/sustainable-rai-evaluation.
