Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces S鲁Gym, an interactive benchmark designed to evaluate the self-improvement capabilities of large language models (LLMs) through self-testing, self-judging, and self-improvement mechanisms. The study reveals that while context-level experience can enhance performance in certain model-game pairs, the effectiveness of self-improvement pathways鈥攕uch as direct history in-context learning, score-conditioned summary memory, and parameter training鈥攙aries significantly based on task structure. Key findings indicate that simply recognizing successful actions is not enough; agents must effectively convert feedback into actionable and transferable policies, highlighting the complexity of self-improvement in LLMs.
Self-improvement in LLMs is not automatic; the pathway to effective learning depends critically on the task structure and the nature of the feedback received.
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly interact with external environments and accumulate substantial behavioral experience, yet existing agent benchmarks largely evaluate them as fixed policies. It therefore remains unclear whether an agent can actively test its behavior, judge the resulting experience, and use that experience to improve future decisions. We introduce \textbf{S\textsuperscript{3}Gym}, an interactive benchmark for evaluating LLM self-improvement through three coupled capabilities: \textbf{Self-Testing}, \textbf{Self-Judging}, and \textbf{Self-Improvement}. S$^3$Gym separates permissive exploration from strict held-out evaluation and instantiates this protocol in seven text-based games with executable environment verifiers. We evaluate three pathways for incorporating interaction experience: direct History ICL, score-conditioned Summary Memory, and parameter Training. Our experiments reveal that self-improvement is neither automatic nor uniform. Context-level experience improves performance for several model--game pairs, but the most effective pathway depends strongly on the task structure: summaries are beneficial when experience can be compressed into reusable strategic rules, yet often underperform raw history when success depends on precise, state-contingent information. Parameter training produces substantial gains on some tasks, but also exhibits unstable improvement and severe negative transfer on others. These findings show that recognizing successful actions is insufficient; agents must also transform feedback into executable and transferable policies. S$^3$Gym provides a unified framework for diagnosing this process and identifying the bottlenecks that prevent agents from translating interaction experience into reliable self-improvement.
