Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces MusGU+, a musician-centered evaluation framework designed to assess generative music systems based on Adaptability, Usability, and Controllability. By evaluating 10 representative generative music systems, the authors highlight the limitations of existing frameworks like MusGO in facilitating systematic comparisons and practical adoption by musicians. The key result is the development of an interactive discovery tool that empowers musicians to explore and select models tailored to their creative workflows, enhancing the practical utility of generative music AI.
MusGU+ reveals that existing generative music frameworks fall short in helping musicians effectively evaluate and adopt AI tools for their creative processes.
Generative music systems are increasingly presented as tools that democratize music creation, yet their practical suitability for musicians remains underexplored. Prior work includes openness-focused evaluation frameworks, such as MusGO (Music-Generative Open AI), as well as qualitative studies of musicians' experiences with generative systems. However, these approaches do not support systematic comparison or early-stage discovery of models for creative use. Motivated by such limitations, we introduce MusGU+, a musician-centered evaluation framework organized around three dimensions: Adaptability, Usability, and Controllability. Together, these capture whether a model can be feasibly trained or fine-tuned on personal data, integrated into real-world music workflows, and controlled in musically meaningful ways. We evaluate 10 representative generative music systems and present an interactive discovery tool that enables musicians to explore and filter models according to these criteria. While MusGO remains valuable for promoting responsible research practices, MusGU+ supports informed selection and practical adoption of generative systems by musicians.
