Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper conducts three comprehensive studies of parliamentary speech across four Slavic languages, utilizing the extensive ParlaSpeech 3.0 corpus. The findings reveal that negative sentiment consistently correlates with higher pitch and intensity, while filled pause frequencies are influenced by speech rate, age, and sentiment, with notable gender differences varying by language group. Additionally, the research uncovers systematic patterns in primary stress variation in Croatian, highlighting the complexity of linguistic features in political discourse.
Negative sentiment in parliamentary speech not only alters pitch and intensity but also reveals surprising cross-linguistic gender dynamics in filled pauses.
We present three large-scale studies of spoken parliamentary speech across four Slavic languages (Croatian, Czech, Polish, Serbian), drawing on over 6,000 hours from the ParlaSpeech 3.0 corpus. The first study examines how utterance-level sentiment shapes acoustic realisation: negative speech is consistently produced with higher pitch, greater intensity, and faster rate across all four parliaments, with a secondary arousal-driven upturn at the most positive extreme. The second study models filled pause frequency using negative binomial GEE, finding that speech rate, age, and sentiment are robust cross-lingual predictors, while gender effects reverse between South Slavic (men produce fewer filled pauses) and West Slavic parliaments (no gender difference) - a pattern invisible to single-language designs. The third study investigates primary stress variation in Croatian, showing that speaker-level preferences for early versus late stress cohere across verbs, adjectives, and nouns but decouple for adverbs and proper nouns. We conclude with a research agenda spanning corpus phonetics, disfluency modelling, and political rhetoric.
