Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces CorrectVLA, a framework that enables the correction of systematic failures in Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models through task-level natural language feedback, without the need for retraining. By applying uniform additive action adjustments based on a single human-provided correction, the framework effectively addresses execution misalignment failures in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution tasks. In real-robot experiments, CorrectVLA demonstrates a remarkable ability to restore near-perfect success rates in scenarios where the base policy fails, highlighting its potential for practical deployment in dynamic environments.
A single natural language correction can restore near-perfect performance in VLA models that would otherwise fail under environmental shifts.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models demonstrate strong semantic understanding yet exhibit systematic failures during deployment. The conditions under which these failures occur, and whether they can be corrected without retraining, remain poorly understood. In this paper, we take steps toward addressing this gap. We present CorrectVLA, a framework that translates task-level natural language corrections into additive action magnitude adjustments without modifying policy weights. A human provides a single task-level correction, applied uniformly across all rollouts without per-episode intervention. In simulation, CorrectVLA recovers execution misalignment failures across both in-distribution and OOD tasks. In real-robot experiments on a UFactory xArm7 under environment shift, CorrectVLA restores near-perfect success where the base policy almost entirely breaks down, generalizing across object locations and identities. Through a taxonomy of failure modes on LIBERO-90, we find that execution misalignment failures, where the policy reaches the correct target but miscalibrates action magnitudes, represent the correctable subset, while other failure modes where semantic comprehension itself breaks down are not amenable to this approach. The approach succeeds when policies possess strategic correctness and fails when fundamental comprehension is absent, establishing a practical operational boundary for inference-time correction.
