Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Error-Augmented Preference Optimization (EAPO), a novel framework designed to enhance the reliability of emotion preference judgments made by multimodal large language models (MLLMs). By generating a richer dataset with multiple controlled negative descriptions for each positive one and employing multiple independent MLLM judges, the authors address both data sparsity and model bias issues that hinder accurate emotional assessments. Experiments reveal that EAPO significantly improves emotion preference predictions and the robustness of MLLM judges against emotionally inconsistent yet semantically fluent descriptions.
Emotion preference models can be dramatically improved by addressing both data sparsity and model bias, leading to more accurate emotional assessments in multimodal contexts.
Emotion preference learning uses pairwise comparisons between candidate descriptions to align multimodal large language models (MLLMs) with human judgments of open-ended emotion descriptions and to train reward models that capture human emotional preferences. However, conventional pairwise supervision is often sparse, typically providing only a single negative description for each positive description, and therefore offers limited coverage of the diverse ways in which an emotion description can be incorrect. In particular, models may be insufficiently exposed to semantically fluent but emotionally inconsistent descriptions. Beyond this data-level limitation, relying on a single MLLM judge introduces a distinct model-level concern: its judgments can be affected by model-specific biases when interpreting fine-grained or ambiguous multimodal emotional cues. To address these limitations, we propose Error-Augmented Preference Optimization (EAPO), a framework for improving the reliability of MLLM-based emotion preference judgment at both the data and model levels. First, we construct an error-augmented dataset by generating multiple controlled and emotion-aware negative descriptions from each preferred description. We then adapt multiple independent MLLM judges to this richer supervision and aggregate their preference margins using margin-calibrated soft fusion, which maps heterogeneous margins to a common scale before aggregation. Experiments on the MER2026-EmoPrefer Challenge dataset and our error-augmented dataset demonstrate that EAPO improves emotion preference prediction and enhances the robustness of MLLM judges when evaluating fluent descriptions that conflict with the video's multimodal emotional evidence. Our code is available at https://github.com/slash1028/EAPO-EmoPrefer.
