Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the concept of predictive relevance in time series forecasting by defining it as the expected future utility of historical examples, conditioned on inference-time information. The authors introduce a method that combines a normalized-pattern retriever for candidate generation with a residual multilayer perceptron (MLP) that reranks these candidates based on their future compatibility, leveraging future supervision during training. The results demonstrate significant improvements in retrieval performance across multiple benchmarks, highlighting the importance of query-specific relevance in enhancing forecasting accuracy.
Historical relevance in time series forecasting is not universal; it鈥檚 structured and domain-dependent, revealing that future supervision can dramatically enhance predictive performance.
Historical retrieval for time-series prediction commonly treats past similarity as a proxy for usefulness. We ask a different question: which historical examples should be expected to matter for a query? We define predictive relevance as expected future utility conditioned on inference-time information, using realized futures only during training as privileged supervision. A normalized-pattern retriever first forms a coarse candidate set, and a lightweight residual multilayer perceptron (MLP) learns a listwise future-compatibility target while keeping inference-time scoring strictly past-only. Our method retains similarity-based candidate generation but reranks its candidates by a more predictive relevance criterion. Optimal relevance decomposes into candidate-level utility and query-specific compatibility, motivating Candidate-Prior and Shuffled-Future controls. Across six benchmarks, the reranker improves Pattern retrieval while revealing candidate-global, query-specific, and mixed relevance regimes. On all 12 confirmatory tasks, it improves Pattern and outperforms a matched-protocol Stationarity-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Time Series Forecasting (SARAF) retrieval rule. Architecture-matched ablations show that correct future supervision, rather than the MLP or added context alone, drives gains in query-specific regimes. Alternative-similarity experiments show that a strong last-value-anchored L2 rule remains superior in some domains, whereas future-supervised relevance is particularly strong where our diagnostics indicate query-specific relevance, especially on Solar. Candidate-pool diagnostics show that this contrast is not explained solely by coarse Pattern retrieval. Overall, historical relevance is structured and domain dependent rather than governed by a universally superior retrieval rule.
