Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the challenge of accurately identifying physical support in highly coherent dictionaries through a novel resolution-aware physical-support inference method. By integrating uncertainty from both the learned dictionary and deployment signals, the authors establish a framework that ensures calibration compatibility while maintaining sparse representations. The key finding reveals that the minimax physical resolution can be optimized based on the number of calibration signals and the separation scale, leading to improved physical localization under specific conditions.
Calibration-compatible dictionaries can yield drastically different physical interpretations, but a new method reveals how to maintain accuracy in sparse representations despite this challenge.
Sparse pursuit after dictionary learning can yield a precise atom support even when its physical interpretation is not justified by the calibration data, especially for highly coherent dictionaries where alternative calibration-compatible dictionaries may assign different physical meanings to the same selected support. We develop resolution-aware physical-support inference that jointly accounts for uncertainty in the learned dictionary and in the representation of a deployment signal. Our cross-dictionary confidence correspondence retains calibration-compatible dictionaries and deployment-compatible sparse representations, then projects the surviving explanations onto physical-support space. For local coherent-atom classes with separation scale s, once the deployment data resolve the coherent-block explanation and its atom support, the minimax physical resolution from N calibration signals satisfies $\delta_{\mathrm{opt}}(N,s)\asymp\min\{s,\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}s^2}\}$, with relative resolution governed by the orientation-information scale $Ns^6$. Deployment replication improves physical localization only when orientation changes cannot be absorbed by adjusting the active coefficients. For computation, we introduce active endpoint bracketing (AEB), an adaptive finite-bank procedure that evaluates only candidates that can still affect the physical report and otherwise safely coarsens or abstains. Finite-bank experiments, including a four-region synthetic application, show that a point-valued plug-in selector can be physically overprecise, whereas AEB avoids unsupported refinement with fewer candidate evaluations.
