Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The Brain Researcher platform enhances the rigor of AI-driven scientific analyses in neuroimaging by enforcing rules for admissible analyses and systematic checks. It significantly improves tool-selection accuracy and verifiable grounding, achieving a 70.2 percentage point increase in first-choice tool-selection accuracy and raising verifiable grounding from 4.6% to 22.0%. By integrating methodological judgment directly into the research workflow, Brain Researcher addresses common pitfalls in AI analyses, such as selective analysis and premature conclusions.
AI agents can now make scientifically defensible claims by embedding methodological rigor directly into the research process, drastically improving analysis accuracy.
AI agents can execute scientific analyses, but an analytic output becomes a defensible claim only after alternatives are weighed and the claim is limited to what the evidence supports. Agents may reproduce failures including selective analysis, premature declarations of success and optimization of imperfect criteria. We present Brain Researcher, an agentic research harness operating in a neuroimaging researcher's computational environment under rules for admissible analyses, required checks and claim scope. In benchmarks, Brain Researcher increased first-choice tool-selection accuracy across seven models by 70.2 percentage points (23.3% without it versus 93.6% with it) and verifiable grounding from 4.6% to 22.0%. In collaborator-led and self-evolving studies, multiverse analyses exposed analytic-choice sensitivity, and scientific review classified claims as accepted, qualified, revised, blocked, rejected or deferred. By linking decisions to evidence and provenance, Brain Researcher embeds methodological judgment within the workflow, not after it.
