Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a three-tier multi-agent architecture for enhancing V2X security in connected vehicles, addressing the critical 100-millisecond decision window for processing Basic Safety Messages. By classifying incoming messages into four actions within strict timing constraints, the system prioritizes safety and minimizes the risk of false alerts while leveraging federated learning to improve detection models across the fleet. The proposed framework uniquely integrates safety-security conflict resolution as a fundamental design constraint, marking a significant advancement over existing intrusion detection systems that operate in isolation.
A multi-agent architecture that prioritizes safety in connected vehicles can decisively mitigate the risks of false emergency alerts within a stringent 100-millisecond window.
A connected vehicle has roughly 100 milliseconds to decide whether an incoming Basic Safety Message is real or fabricated. If a false emergency braking alert reaches the planning pipeline in time, the car brakes - a safety failure triggered by a security failure. Existing intrusion detection systems are not designed to handle that coupling. They operate per vehicle, per message, with static rules - blind to attack patterns that only emerge across a fleet or over time, and blind to the fundamental tension between dropping a suspicious message and dropping a real emergency alert. We propose a three-tier multi-agent architecture that treats this timing constraint as a hard design requirement, not a performance target. At the vehicle level, an onboard agent classifies each incoming V2X message into one of four actions - Accept, Drop, Quarantine, or Escalate - within a 10-millisecond budget, deliberately biased toward Escalate when uncertain, passing ambiguous cases to the roadside edge agent rather than risking a dropped legitimate alert. The edge agent operates across a roadside unit zone with a 50-millisecond budget, fusing threat assessments from multiple vehicles and resolving safety-security conflicts using complementary sensor observations. The cloud tier refines detection models through Byzantine fault-tolerant federated learning and redistributes updated weights to the fleet. Every timing constraint derives directly from the 100-millisecond Basic Safety Message cycles mandated by SAE J2735 and ETSI EN 302 637-2. No existing framework simultaneously assigns standards-grounded latency budgets to all three deployment tiers while treating safety-security conflict resolution as a first-class design constraint. Remaining open problems - adversarial poisoning at the edge and the absence of regulatory frameworks for autonomous security response - are discussed as future work.
