Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces a computational framework that analyzes dynamic team-process phases in collaborative virtual reality (VR) environments by employing late chunking for context-aware transcript representations and penalized Gaussian-kernel change-point detection for identifying semantic transitions. The framework effectively aligns detected phases with independently recorded interaction logs, revealing coherent phase structures that correspond to specific task-action patterns. Key findings indicate that this approach enhances the interpretability of team communication dynamics while maintaining traceability to the original dialogue data, offering valuable insights into collaborative processes over time.
A novel computational framework reveals how team communication dynamics in VR can be dissected into coherent phases that align with specific actions, enhancing our understanding of collaboration.
Collaborative virtual reality (VR) environments make team communication observable as it unfolds, but conventional transcript analyses often summarize entire trials or divide them into fixed temporal windows. Such approaches can obscure changes in team communication and coordination over time. This article presents a computational framework for detecting and interpreting dynamic team-process phases from timestamped dialogue in a collaborative VR game. The framework uses late chunking to generate context-aware transcript representations, aggregates them into temporal chunks, and applies penalized Gaussian-kernel change-point detection to identify semantic transitions in team communication. After boundary detection, term frequency--inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), and representative transcript segments provide structured evidence for phase interpretation. A locally deployed large language model (LLM) uses in-context learning to generate initial interpretations that are subsequently reviewed by humans. Independently recorded interaction logs are then aligned with the detected phases to examine corresponding task-action patterns. The evaluation compares representations, pooling strategies, segmentation methods, parameter settings, reviewed phase interpretations, and phase-aligned interaction profiles. The results show that the framework identifies coherent and interpretable phase structures while preserving traceability to the underlying transcript evidence. The correspondence between transcript-derived phases and interaction behavior further supports their relevance for analyzing collaborative activity. The framework therefore offers a transparent and transferable approach for studying temporal changes in teamwork from timestamped transcripts across collaborative task settings.
