Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a capability-based planning framework tailored for AI crisis preparedness, addressing the limitations of traditional predict-then-act approaches that fail to account for the unpredictability of AI risks. By systematically sampling scenarios and assessing government capabilities against these scenarios, the authors create a prioritization matrix that informs decision-making under deep uncertainty. The pilot study across four severe AI-enabled threat classes demonstrates the framework's potential to yield actionable insights for enhancing governmental preparedness against AI-related crises.
Traditional risk assessment fails for AI, but a new capability-based planning framework reveals actionable insights for crisis preparedness.
Capability-based planning drives preparedness in defense and homeland security, but has yet to be applied seriously to AI. Government AI preparations follow a predict-then-act paradigm: rank risks by likelihood and impact, then prepare for the highest expected harm. AI resists prediction: expert timelines disagree by orders of magnitude, and official reviews concede that likelihood-based risk assessment fails for exactly this class of risk. Drawing on principles of decision making under deep uncertainty, we propose a methodological framework in three parts: a scenario library sampled systematically across declared axes; a rating procedure that assesses each government capability against each scenario on coarse, gated criteria; and a prioritization step that maps the resulting matrix onto decision rules a government might adopt. Through a pilot across the four most severe AI-enabled threat classes, we illustrate the kind of insight the instrument yields and provide a proof of concept for capability-based planning as a practical tool for AI crisis preparedness.
