Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Redakto, a tool designed to anonymize text by redacting personally identifiable information (PII) before it is processed by Large Language Models (LLMs). The urgency of this tool is underscored by new EU legislation that heightens privacy concerns, which could hinder innovation in AI applications. Empirical evaluations show that Redakto's anonymization strategies maintain utility scores comparable to original texts, indicating its effectiveness for LLM tasks without compromising performance.
Redakto achieves PII redaction while preserving the utility of text for LLM applications, addressing critical privacy concerns in the wake of new EU regulations.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are being increasingly used in everyday applications. A major challenge in the context of LLMs or Artificial Intelligence (AI) in general is to ensure privacy when using them, meaning that personally identifiable information (PII) is removed from any text that enters an LLM. These challenges have become more urgent with novel EU legislation. Uncertainty around LLM usage with respect to privacy concerns in EU countries can be a major blocker for the speed of innovation and transfer from research to applications. Here we present \textbf{Redakto}, a tool that can be used for anonymizing text prior to feeding it to an LLM or other downstream text processing. We provide state-of-the-art functionalities for both redaction of PII but also when used for pseudonymization. These functionalities are exposed such that they can easily be used by end-users, through the Redakto web application, and by developers and researchers, via REST APIs and model context protocol (MCP) hooks. The implementation is fully open source, requires modest compute resources, and can be readily deployed on local hardware. In contrast to prior work and in order to better assess the quality of the anonymized texts, we conduct extensive empirical evaluations on textual data from legal and medical domain with respect to both privacy and utility of the redacted texts. Our empirical results demonstrate that the texts anonymized with different redaction strategies achieve utility scores on par with the original texts, suggesting that anonymization with Redakto can be used for LLM tasks without substantial negative impact for the tasks we explored.
