Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the concept of delegation asymmetry in agentic recommender systems within online dating, focusing on users' receptivity to both sending and receiving communication via autonomous agents. Utilizing two large-scale surveys with nearly 3,000 participants, the researchers developed a latent-variable measurement model that distinguishes between the willingness to deploy one's own agent and to engage with others' agents, revealing a significant disparity in receptivity thresholds. The findings indicate that while users are more inclined to deploy their agents, the actual engagement with counterparts' agents is considerably lower, highlighting critical implications for the design of agent-mediated communication systems.
Users are three times more likely to deploy their own agents than to engage with others', revealing a critical asymmetry that could hinder the effectiveness of agentic recommender systems in online dating.
Autonomous LLM agents that converse on a user's behalf are an emerging design pattern in matching platforms, yet their viability depends on a condition rarely examined: users must accept not only delegating conversation to an agent, but also receiving agent-mediated communication from others. We study this condition using two large-scale surveys of active users of a major dating platform (N=2,894 on generative profile features; N=2,617 on autonomous conversational agents, fielded in two languages). We develop a latent-variable measurement model of agent receptivity based on graded response models with latent regression, and show via model comparison that willingness to send and willingness to receive agent communication are distinct constructs: highly correlated (rho=0.92) but separable (Delta BIC=52), with partial measurement invariance across languages. The model quantifies a systematic delegation asymmetry: deploying one's own agent requires far lower receptivity (threshold -0.38) than engaging a counterpart's agent (+0.32; full engagement +1.39), and mean deployment propensity exceeds engagement propensity roughly threefold. Under a random-pairing counterfactual derived from stated receptivity, only 4-13% of directed dyads combine agent deployment with receiver engagement, with a pronounced gender-directional imbalance. Design counterfactuals quantify the levers: a reciprocity requirement cuts interaction volume by half or more by excluding nearly two-thirds of would-be deployment, while routing agent contacts on receive receptivity triples per-contact engagement, a lift that survives out-of-sample validation with the target item held out (AUC 0.88, 3.1x quartile lift under respondent-level cross-validation). We discuss implications for agentic recommender design, including disclosure, opt-in mechanics, and receptivity-aware matchmaking.
