Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces CoAL-RAG, a complexity-aware legal retrieval-augmented generation method that adapts retrieval strategies based on the logical structure and complexity of legal questions. By quantifying reasoning demands and utilizing discrepancies between semantic and keyword retrieval, the method dynamically selects the most effective retrieval approach, enhancing both interpretability and efficiency. Experimental results show that CoAL-RAG significantly outperforms baseline models on Chinese legal benchmarks, with a 42.5% improvement in BLEU scores and a 3.6-fold increase in ROUGE-L, while also achieving competitive accuracy on English datasets.
CoAL-RAG achieves a remarkable 42.5% boost in BLEU scores for legal question retrieval, redefining efficiency and interpretability in complex legal consultations.
Legal consultation questions exhibit multi-level complexity. A single retrieval strategy often leads to over-reasoning for simple questions and poor interpretability for complex ones, making it difficult to meet the requirements for both answer quality and efficiency in high-risk scenarios. To address this issue, this paper proposes CoAL-RAG, a complexity-aware legal retrieval-augmented generation method, which constructs a multi-dimensional evaluation mechanism based on ``question essence''and ``retrieval consistency''to enable adaptive routing of retrieval strategies. First, the reasoning demand is quantified according to the logical structure of the question. Then, the discrepancy between semantic retrieval and keyword retrieval is utilized to indirectly reflect problem complexity, thereby selecting the most appropriate retrieval strategy and dynamically filtering contextual information. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms baseline models not only on Chinese legal benchmarks (SocialLawQA, LawBench) but also demonstrates strong cross-jurisdictional generalization on English datasets (LexGLUE, CaseHold). Specifically, on Chinese datasets, the BLEU score improves by 42.5\% and ROUGE-L reaches 3.6 times that of knowledge graph-based methods. On English benchmarks, CoAL-RAG maintains highly competitive accuracy, achieving an optimal balance between generation quality, deep logical reasoning, and system efficiency across different legal systems.
