Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper tackles the pervasive issues of position and popularity bias in recommender systems that rely on implicit feedback, which can distort true user preferences. By focusing on learning-to-rank (LTR) systems and collaborative filtering (CF) models, the authors propose novel methods that effectively mitigate these biases, leading to enhanced recommendation accuracy. The key result demonstrates that their approach significantly improves the relevance and personalization of recommendations, aligning more closely with actual user preferences.
Position and popularity biases in recommender systems can be effectively mitigated, leading to recommendations that truly reflect user preferences rather than skewed interactions.
Recommender systems typically rely on implicit feedback (e.g., clicks) to infer user preferences. However, such data is inherently prone to various biases, including position bias and popularity bias. Position bias occurs when higher-ranked items receive more interactions regardless of true relevance. Popularity bias reinforces frequent exposure of popular items while under-recommending relevant, yet less popular ones. Directly learning from such data fails to capture true user preferences, leading to suboptimal recommendations. This research focuses on mitigating position bias and popularity bias in recommender systems. Specifically, I address position bias in learning-to-rank (LTR) systems and popularity bias in collaborative filtering (CF) models and social recommender systems based on graph neural networks. My work develops methods that overcome the limitations of existing approaches to mitigating position bias and popularity bias, enabling more relevant and personalized recommendations that align with users'preferences.
