Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the user-side dynamics of AI model lifecycles through the lens of the Keep4o movement surrounding GPT-4o, analyzing 61,846 public posts to uncover user motivations and concerns post-deployment. Findings reveal that user discussions extend beyond mere access to the model, encompassing experiences, behavioral changes, and governance issues that reflect the relational value of long-term use. The research highlights that effective model replacement must consider user value continuity and the implications of model changes on actual usage, underscoring the importance of integrating user experiences into lifecycle management strategies.
User motivations for keeping GPT-4o reveal that effective model replacement hinges on maintaining established user value, not just technical upgrades.
AI model lifecycles are commonly understood as a series of technical and organizational processes. Yet once a model enters sustained use, subsequent changes can also affect established user practices and user value. Using the Keep4o movement around GPT-4o as a case, this study examines post-deployment AI model lifecycle issues from the user side. We collected 61,846 public original posts on X from August 2025 to March 2026 and, using a systematically developed coding framework and LLM-assisted content analysis, analyzed discussion themes, users'reasons for wanting to keep GPT-4o, and the specific claims they made. Findings show that the Keep4o discussion extended well beyond continued access to the model itself. It covered concrete experiences of use, model behavioral characteristics and how they changed, and management issues across different stages of the model lifecycle. Reasons for keeping GPT-4o reflected interactional and relational value formed through long-term use, as well as judgments about the adequacy of replacement and the reasonableness of related decisions. The corresponding claims further reflected users'specific expectations for model lifecycle arrangements and governance. Overall, the call to"keep GPT-4o"brought together different judgments about user value and governance concerns. These findings suggest that technical version succession does not necessarily amount to effective replacement on the user side. Post-deployment AI model lifecycle management therefore needs to consider whether established user value can be carried forward and how model changes affect actual use. This study thus provides user-side empirical evidence for AI model lifecycle management. It further shows that user experience can provide important information for identifying post-deployment impacts and should be incorporated into lifecycle evaluation and decision-making.
