Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how prior audit-repair episodes influence the leniency of language model verifiers in automated checking pipelines. By analyzing false alarm rates on human-verified ProcessBench traces, the authors demonstrate that completed audit-repair episodes reduce false alarms by 2.8 to 11.5 percentage points, contradicting existing literature that suggests accumulated messages should lead to increased flagging. The findings reveal that the combination of repair content and audit verdicts affects different model families, ultimately shifting the detection threshold rather than altering discrimination capabilities.
Prior audit-repair episodes can significantly lower false alarm rates in language model verifiers, challenging assumptions about accumulated-message effects.
Automated checking pipelines increasingly place one language model as the checker and another (or the same one) as the fixer. We ask whether that wiring changes what the checker reports. Measuring false alarms on human-verified-correct ProcessBench traces with the present task held byte-identical, we find that a completed audit ->repair episode already in the model's context lowers false alarms in 15 of 15 model x wording combinations, by 2.8 to 11.5 percentage points against a length-matched non-audit control, a 9 to 25% reduction relative to that control. The direction contradicts what the accumulated-message literature predicts: an episode whose audit reported an error lowers false alarms further still, at all five wordings on the model where that manipulation lands cleanly, though a negativity asymmetry predicts more flagging. Decomposing the episode finds repair content and audit verdict complementary: different components carry the effect on different model families. Signal-detection analysis locates the change in the threshold rather than in discrimination -- the criterion moves in 15 of 15 combinations and survives correction in 13 while d'survives in none, though the d'test is half as sensitive by construction -- and a hand audit of 50 false alarms finds 82% simply wrong, so at this operating point the shift need not be harmful. With reasoning enabled the effect keeps its relative size on both models tested, and the threshold reading holds there too.
