Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces RUPA (Relational Uncertainty Propagation for Agents), a novel trajectory-level uncertainty quantification framework designed for large language model agents operating in complex environments. By representing execution history as a directed trajectory graph, RUPA captures long-range dependencies and propagates uncertainty across interaction steps, which traditional methods fail to address. Experimental evaluations across various benchmarks reveal that RUPA significantly enhances uncertainty estimates, facilitates earlier failure detection, and improves agent performance in diverse tasks compared to existing methods.
RUPA reveals that accurately modeling relational dependencies can dramatically enhance uncertainty quantification for LLM agents, leading to earlier failure detection and improved task execution.
Reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential for deploying large language model (LLM) agents in complex interactive environments. Existing UQ methods largely rely on local signals, such as token probabilities, predictive entropy, or per-step confidence, and therefore overlook the long-range dependencies through which errors accumulate across an execution trajectory. As a result, they may fail to identify agent failures whose causes originate several reasoning or interaction steps before the final answer. We propose RUPA (Relational Uncertainty Propagation for Agents), a trajectory-level UQ framework for LLM agents. RUPA represents an execution history as a directed trajectory graph in which reasoning states, tool interactions, and environment feedback are nodes connected by temporal and semantic dependency edges. It then propagates uncertainty over this graph to capture how execution risk accumulates and transfers across interaction steps. The propagated signal is combined with trajectory-level behavioral features and goal-alignment information to produce a confidence estimate for the full agent trajectory. We evaluate RUPA on representative agent benchmarks, including $\tau$-2, Terminal-Bench-2, and GAIA, using 6 open-source LLMs spanning multiple model families. Experimental results show that RUPA consistently outperforms existing UQ methods by providing more accurate uncertainty estimates, enabling earlier failure detection, and improving uncertainty-guided agent execution across diverse agent tasks. These results demonstrate that explicitly modeling relational dependency is crucial to reliable UQ for long-horizon LLM agents, providing a practical foundation for trustworthy agent execution.
