Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces AutoDesign, a novel framework that utilizes a meta-harness optimizer to enhance the design process of multimodal outputs, specifically targeting the generation of academic posters from papers. By aligning with human design principles and leveraging empirical feedback for recursive self-improvement, AutoDesign outperforms existing systems, achieving a score of 78.32 on the PosterBench Main Track, significantly surpassing the closed-source system Claude Design. The framework not only improves performance across various configurations but also demonstrates high-quality output in a fully autonomous setting, achieving human preference in evaluations.
AutoDesign outperforms existing design systems by aligning with human design principles and achieving superior poster generation quality through recursive self-improvement.
Transforming multimodal sources into condensed and structured media outputs can be fundamentally conceptualized as a long-horizon agentic process centered on a model-harness system. While an ideal harness system should align with human design priors and accumulate reusable experience through empirical exploration to drive recursive self-improvement, existing paradigms remain static and fall short of this capability. In this paper, we present AutoDesign, a framework that aligns with human design priors, where a meta-harness optimizer guides a code agent to recursively improve harness based on rollout feedback. To instantiate and evaluate this framework, we focus on the academic paper-to-poster generation task and introduce PosterBench, comprising a 100-paper Main Track spanning five disciplines and PosterBench-mini, a shared 10-paper subset for controlled evaluation. On the PosterBench Main Track, AutoDesign achieves the highest score of 78.32, surpassing the closed-source commercial system Claude Design by 7.45 points. Across seven controlled code-agent-model configurations, integrating the learned DesignHarness consistently improves performance, increasing the average PosterBench Score from 54.99 to 67.39 (+12.4%). In a fully autonomous long-horizon loop, it executes 253 tool calls and 11 editing turns within 40 minutes for under $3, reaching average conference-poster quality in human evaluation. A system-blind human study further demonstrates that AutoDesign achieves the highest human preference among evaluated systems.
Tsinghua AI