Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces the Time-Aware Multi-View MRI Benchmark, designed to evaluate foundation models on their ability to reason about disease progression in longitudinal MRI scans by integrating multi-view anatomical data and temporal reasoning. The benchmark includes 3,920 expert-verified question-answer pairs from 890 patients, addressing critical aspects like anatomical change localization and progression characterization across various clinical conditions. Results indicate that while multi-view inputs enhance spatial localization, they can hinder temporal reasoning, highlighting significant gaps in current model capabilities for clinical applications.
Multi-view MRI inputs can enhance spatial localization but may compromise temporal reasoning, revealing critical limitations in current foundation models for clinical use.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) interpretation is fundamental to clinical decision-making, requiring radiologists to integrate multi-view anatomical planes across sequential timepoints while precisely localizing interval changes. However, existing vision-language benchmarks remain confined to single-timepoint, single-view interpretation, failing to capture the temporal-spatial reasoning essential to radiologic practice. We introduce the Time-Aware Multi-View MRI Benchmark, an evaluation framework unifying multi-view anatomical input, temporal reasoning across longitudinal scans, and structured localization guidance. The benchmark comprises 3,920 expert-verified question-answer pairs derived from 890 patients across over 3,200 longitudinal MRI timepoints, drawn from seven clinical cohorts covering glioblastoma, neurodegeneration, vestibular schwannoma, and brain metastases, in open-ended, multiple-choice, and binary formats, requiring models to identify anatomical regions of maximal change, characterize progression across sequences and views, and provide structured guidance specifying boundaries, imaging features, and confounders. Experiments across 16 vision-language models reveal moderate temporal alignment but systematic failure on change direction recognition and volumetric quantification, while multi-view inputs improve spatial localization yet degrade temporal reasoning in compact architectures. Our benchmark provides a systematic framework for evaluating progression tracking, interval change localization, and temporal ordering, which are essential for clinical deployment. Code, evaluation splits, and the dataset are available at: https://github.com/wafaAlghallabi/Time-Aware-MRI.
