Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the challenge of group-robust learning in scenarios where training-group labels are unavailable by introducing ProME, a method that aligns environment selection with the deployed predictor. By formulating the problem as endogenous environments with repair-aware selection, ProME constructs balanced environments using prototype margins and optimizes a group-balanced classifier based on validation data. The results demonstrate that ProME significantly outperforms existing methods, achieving the highest average worst-group accuracy while effectively managing shortcut-conflicting examples.
ProME achieves unprecedented group robustness by aligning environment selection directly with the deployed predictor, leading to superior worst-group accuracy.
Group-robust learning is crucial for maintaining accuracy on rare subpopulations when training-group labels are unavailable. However, existing methods often infer environments from a separate reference model and select representations before fitting the classifier used at deployment, leaving both decisions misaligned with the deployed predictor. In this work, we formulate group robustness without training-group labels as the endogenous environments with repair-aware selection (ERAS) problem, and propose ProME (Prototype-Margin Environments) to align both decisions with the deployed predictor. ProME splits prototype margins at their median to construct approximately balanced environments along the training trajectory, and fits a group-balanced linear head on group-annotated validation data to rank the resulting predictors by validation worst-group accuracy. We theoretically bound the worst risk across the inferred environments for a fixed predictor and partition, showing that this bound transfers to the oracle groups under an explicit alignment condition. Extensive experiments show that prototype margins enrich shortcut-conflicting examples, classifier repair reshapes candidate evaluation, and ProME achieves the highest average worst-group accuracy among the compared methods with the same group-label access.
