Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces LigBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to provide a unified and objective evaluation framework for research idea generation using large language models (LLMs). By addressing the fragmentation in current evaluation practices, LigBench offers fine-grained assessments that align closely with expert judgments, while the PAIR-IQ dataset enhances the training of pairwise idea judgment models. Experimental results show that LigBench not only improves evaluation stability but also increases the ranking accuracy and robustness of models trained on PAIR-IQ, establishing a new standard for assessing AI-generated research ideas.
LigBench transforms the landscape of LLM-driven research idea generation by providing a unified benchmark that aligns closely with expert evaluations.
With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), research idea generation has attracted increasing attention. Existing approaches enable LLMs to retrieve relevant literature and propose novel ideas for research areas. However, current evaluation practices for idea generation remain fragmented and lack objective standards, often relying on direct LLM scoring, which limits their ability to provide unified and reliable assessments across a coherent distribution of generated ideas. To address this challenge, we propose LigBench, an automated evaluation benchmark that enables fine-grained and reliable evaluation of AI research ideas, consistently applicable across different generation distributions. In addition, we introduce PAIR-IQ, a dataset tailored for training pairwise idea judgment models and serving as an auxiliary reference to support more objective comparative evaluation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LigBench achieves stable and interpretable evaluations, significantly improving alignment with expert judgments. Furthermore, models trained on PAIR-IQ exhibit enhanced ranking accuracy and robustness, establishing a principled standard for scalable and objective research idea assessment.