Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces LOB-ID, an innovative embedding-based framework that adapts the Fr茅chet Inception Distance (FID) and Monge Inception Distance (MIND) specifically for evaluating generative models of limit order book (LOB) data. By training the DeepLOB architecture on extensive Level-2 order-book data, the authors demonstrate that LOB-ID effectively captures the joint temporal and cross-level structures of order-book trajectories, outperforming traditional evaluation metrics. The results reveal that LOB-ID provides a more nuanced ranking of generative models, aligning with their ability to represent complex market dynamics.
LOB-ID reveals that traditional metrics fail to capture the intricate structures of market data, providing a more sensitive evaluation of generative models in finance.
Generative models of limit orderbook (LOB) data have advanced rapidly, but their evaluation often focuses on stylised facts and selected market statistics. These measures provide useful diagnostics but may not capture the joint temporal and cross-level structure of order-book trajectories. We introduce LOB-ID, an embedding-based framework that adapts the Fr\'echet Inception Distance (FID) and Monge Inception Distance (MIND) to LOB data. To obtain domain-specific embeddings, we train the DeepLOB architecture on four months of Level-2 order-book data for five equities. We show that LOB-ID is stable across time, instruments, and embedding checkpoints, and rises monotonically under controlled distortions. We then construct a moment-matching attack against FID and a deep-book perturbation that evades statistic-based evaluation. MIND remains substantially more sensitive to both distortions. Finally, we score five generative LOB models, spanning stochastic baselines and deep learning approaches, and find that LOB-ID ranks them in line with the joint temporal and cross-level structure each captures by construction.
