Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the concept of strong-to-weak scaffolding for capability transfer at test time, where a stronger builder model creates inference-time harnesses to enhance the performance of a weaker target model without modifying its parameters. By employing this method on four Theory-of-Mind benchmarks, the authors demonstrate that the harnesses significantly improve the target model's performance, nearly doubling its average score from 0.49 to 0.91. The findings reveal that the performance gains stem from offloading unstable reasoning into deterministic code and enforcing strict answer formats, rather than from increased reasoning or sampling by the target model.
Test-time harnesses can nearly double the performance of weaker models, transforming how we think about capability transfer in AI.
Recent work on distillation transfers the capabilities of large models to smaller ones often by updating the latter's parameters, through teacher forcing, on-policy distillation, and related training-time methods. In this paper, we ask whether such transfer can instead occur at test time. We study strong-to-weak scaffolding: whether a stronger builder model can construct inference-time harnesses that help a weaker target model solve tasks more reliably without any parameter updates. Using four representative Theory-of-Mind benchmarks, each builder model uses 5% of the data as a validation set to iteratively refine its harness over multiple rounds, after which the finalized harness is evaluated on the full test set. Empirically, this form of test-time capability transfer is highly effective, nearly doubling average target-model performance from 0.49 to 0.91. Our analysis shows that the gains come primarily from offloading unstable model reasoning into deterministic code, benchmark-specific routing, and strict answer-format enforcement, rather than from encouraging the target model to reason more extensively or sample more broadly. We further find that builder-model reasoning effort improves harness quality monotonically, platform effects are modest relative to the builder model's own capability, and weaker target models receive the largest gains. These results suggest that inference-time harness design is an important complement to conventional training-time distillation, enabling strong models to transfer cognitive structure to weaker models without retraining.
