Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the resilience of the Spiteful Greedy Swap Poisson Process (SGS-Poisson) in the context of nonnegative submodular maximization over matroids, focusing on its performance under adversarial conditions with controlled value oracles. The authors establish that the algorithm maintains robust approximation factors of \(1/e\) for non-monotone and \(1-1/e\) for monotone objectives, even when faced with bounded deviations in oracle outputs. Furthermore, they demonstrate that this resilience facilitates the development of full-bandit algorithms for constrained submodular rewards, achieving efficient regret bounds in online settings.
The Spiteful Greedy Swap Poisson Process retains its approximation guarantees even in adversarial environments, paving the way for robust online learning in submodular settings.
We study nonnegative submodular maximization subject to a general matroid when the offline algorithm is given an arbitrary controlled value oracle. Our main result is an adversarial resilience theorem for the Spiteful Greedy Swap Poisson Process (SGS-Poisson): without modifying its Poisson intensity, single-element exchange rule, or spiteful drop step, the algorithm retains limiting approximation factors $1/e$ for non-monotone objectives and $1-1/e$ for monotone objectives. More precisely, under every controlled oracle $\widehat f$ satisfying $|\widehat f(S)-f(S)|\le 尉$ for every set $S$, our implementation returns a feasible set with expected value at least $(1/e-\varepsilon)\OPT-O(k尉)$ and $(1-1/e-\varepsilon)\OPT-O(k尉)$, respectively, using $\widetilde O(nk^2\varepsilon^{-2})$ oracle calls. As a consequence, the offline-to-online reduction yields full-bandit CMAB algorithms for general matroid-constrained submodular rewards with exact limiting approximation-regret factors $1/e$ and $1-1/e$ and $\widetilde O(n^{1/5}k^{4/5}T^{4/5})$ regret.
