Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Agentic Configuration Management (ACM), a framework-independent model designed to govern and represent heterogeneous agentic systems through coherent, versioned configurations. By normalizing diverse configurations into a canonical Configuration Graph, ACM enables effective governance semantics, ensuring reproducibility and auditability across various frameworks. The evaluation demonstrates that ACM can achieve governance-equivalent representations and reproducible outcomes across multiple agentic platforms, establishing a formal basis for impact propagation and dependency analysis.
Common governance semantics can unify diverse agentic systems, ensuring reproducibility and interoperability across frameworks.
Agentic systems are increasingly composed of heterogeneous agents, prompts, tools, models, skills, composite subsystems, policies, and execution workflows whose configurations evolve across frameworks and runtime environments. Existing LLMOps and AgentOps platforms support orchestration and observability but do not provide a common configuration-governance model for representing and governing these systems as coherent, versioned configurations. This paper introduces Agentic Configuration Management (ACM), a framework-independent governance and configuration reference model for heterogeneous agentic systems. ACM combines typed and independently versioned Agentic Configuration Items, immutable revisions and baselines, explicit configuration-runtime separation, lifecycle and assurance semantics, dependency-aware impact propagation, and runtime provenance. Heterogeneous native configurations are normalized through semantic projection into a canonical Configuration Graph on which common governance semantics operate. We provide a Python reference implementation with adapters for LangGraph, CrewAI, and the OpenAI Agents SDK. The evaluation combines 27 governance scenarios with nine quantitative impact-propagation cases. For the evaluated configurations, the three frameworks yield governance-equivalent ACM representations and reproducible governance outcomes after projection. The impact semantics are formalized as monotone propagation over a finite lattice, establishing convergence, termination, and uniqueness of the least fixed point above the initial impact valuation. These results provide evidence that common governance semantics can support reproducibility, auditability, dependency analysis, and interoperability across heterogeneous agentic execution abstractions within the evaluated scope.
