Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces CriticalSCM-Bench v1, a synthetic benchmark designed to evaluate the effectiveness of causal interventions in supply chains by focusing on maximizing recoverable net value. The authors demonstrate that the LambdaMART ranking algorithm outperforms traditional static benchmarks, achieving a 5.7–16.2% improvement in median normalized net value across various supply chain archetypes, although it underperforms in digital infrastructure scenarios. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of intervention fidelity and timing, revealing that simpler policies can sometimes be more effective than complex models in certain contexts.
LambdaMART can boost supply chain recovery by up to 16% compared to static benchmarks, but complexity doesn't always guarantee better outcomes.
Detecting or attributing a supply-chain disruption is not the same as selecting the intervention that maximizes recoverable net value. We present CriticalSCM-Bench v1, a controlled synthetic benchmark with causal ground truth, paired factual/counterfactual rollouts, and an explicit net-value objective. Relative to a full-information train-selected static benchmark, LambdaMART improves median normalized net value by 5.7--16.2\%, with paired statistical support on the semiconductor and critical-material archetypes but not on digital infrastructure. On digital infrastructure, a domain-informed constant-buffer policy remains stronger, showing that greater model complexity is not uniformly justified. Across partial and delayed settings, LambdaMART retains 33--75\% of full-clamp value. Stress tests further show that intervention fidelity, timing, cost, and held-out disruptions can alter policy ordering. Critical materials show the weakest out-of-distribution retention. Separately, a guarded explanation study over 540 generations preserves every fixed intervention decision after deterministic validation and template fallback, although exact wording remains unstable. Within this controlled setting, the results identify regimes in which adaptive ranking adds value and those in which simpler structural policies remain preferable.
