Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces MISA-T, a novel routing-layer admission policy designed to optimize mixed rollout scheduling in reinforcement learning (RL) pipelines for large language models (LLMs). By addressing the heterogeneous demands of various rollout sessions, MISA-T enhances throughput by over 53% compared to existing cache-aware methods while maintaining high prefix-cache hit rates. The results demonstrate significant improvements in rollout efficiency and iteration times, crucial for managing diverse feedback paradigms in RL settings.
MISA-T boosts rollout throughput by over 53% while preserving workload integrity, revolutionizing how RL pipelines manage heterogeneous demands.
Modern reinforcement learning (RL) post-training pipelines for large language models (LLMs) increasingly combine rollout workloads across multiple domains and feedback paradigms. Prefix-aware routing improves inference efficiency through cache reuse and load balancing, but it does not control how heterogeneous rollout sessions compete for KV-cache capacity. When reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), and agentic rollouts share an asynchronous inference service, their distinct sequence structures, interaction patterns, and KV-residency times create substantially different serving demands. Rollout scheduling must account for this heterogeneity without distorting the workload mixture specified by the trainer. We present MISA-T, a routing-layer admission policy for mixed rollout serving. MISA-T combines adaptive session admission, workload-aware KV-capacity allocation, and residency-time-aware KV accounting. In rollout-only ablations on Step3.7 and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, MISA-T improves rollout throughput over a sweep-tuned cache-aware vLLM Router by 53.3% and 43.6%, respectively, while maintaining high prefix-cache hit rates. In a matched 50-iteration Step3.7 experiment, it increases rollout throughput by 35.6% and reduces mean iteration time by 22.8%, while keeping the consumed workload mixture close to the trainer target and achieving comparable task scores.
