Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes 74 national and 3 regional AI strategies to assess their convergences and divergences across various policy design elements, focusing on goals, approaches, and principles. Using a latent-inductive coding approach, the study reveals significant horizontal convergence in areas like economic competitiveness and ethical AI use, while highlighting persistent divergence in human rights and participatory governance. The findings indicate that while some regions, like the AU, show high vertical convergence, others, such as the EU and Nordic-Baltic Region, exhibit mixed results, providing valuable insights for policy designers in shaping future AI strategies.
National AI strategies are converging on economic goals but diverging sharply on human rights and governance principles.
Governments worldwide have responded to the rapid expansion of AI by publishing national and regional AI strategies. Comparing national and regional AI strategies to identify their convergences and divergences can uncover their common practices, understand regional variations, and provide policy designers a comprehensive set of policy design elements for their ongoing AI strategy developments. Yet, existing work has not examined their underlying policy design elements or assessed whether those elements are horizontally (country-to-country) or vertical (region-to-country) converging or diverging over time. This paper addresses that gap by coding and analyzing 74 national and 3 regional AI strategies drawn from a global scan of all 205 UN member and non-member states. The coding used a latent-inductive approach organized around three functional policy design elements: goals, approaches, and principles. Two research questions guided the analysis: to what degree are national AI strategies becoming horizontally convergent or divergent over time; and to what degree are national strategies becoming vertically convergent or divergent with those countries'regional AI strategy. Results indicate strong horizontal convergence around economic competitiveness, research support, and ethical AI use, alongside persistent divergence in human rights goals, participatory governance approaches, and human-centric principles. Across the three regions, the AU exhibits the highest vertical convergence, the EU demonstrated strong alignment on regulatory and economic priorities but diverges on human-centric values, and the Nordic-Baltic Region displays mixed vertical convergence. These findings offer policy designers a comprehensive evidence base for identifying emerging AI policy design choice norms as AI strategies are developed and updated.
