Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Tsinghua AIGuangdong Laboratory of ArtificialMelbourneNTUShenzhen UniversitySydneyTencent AIAug 11, 2026arXiv:2608.10740This paper introduces Tree-of-Ideas (ToI), a two-stage framework designed to enhance research ideation by reconstructing and reasoning over the evolution of scholarly work. By employing EvoTrace to map branching trajectories from citations and EvoAgent to identify convergent problems and complementary solutions, ToI generates innovative research ideas grounded in the literature. The framework outperforms existing automatic methods in six AI research topics, achieving a score of 6.27, closely rivaling human-generated references, and demonstrating the effectiveness of cross-path evolutionary reasoning.
Cross-path reasoning reveals untapped research ideas, outperforming traditional methods and rivaling human insights in scholarly evolution.
Effective research ideation requires moving beyond a static understanding of prior work to trace how research problems and solutions evolve across the literature. Existing methods either treat papers as unstructured context or model scholarly evolution as isolated citation chains, overlooking interactions among research trajectories. We propose Tree-of-Ideas (ToI), a two-stage framework. EvoTrace reconstructs branching scholarly trajectories from citations, tracking evolving methods, resolved problems, and gaps. EvoAgent then reasons across trajectories to identify convergent problems and complementary solutions, generating grounded research ideas. Across six AI research topics, ToI achieves the highest score among automatic methods (6.27 vs. 5.36 for the strongest baseline on a 10-point scale), with strong Novelty (6.36) and Groundedness (7.00). Also, its score approaches that of human-paper references (6.29), demonstrating the value of cross-path evolutionary reasoning.
