Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates current methodologies for identifying predatory open access journals, revealing critical limitations such as the absence of a universal definition and the pitfalls of binary classification systems. To overcome these challenges, the authors propose a novel multivariate graph analysis approach that models the academic publishing ecosystem as a network of interconnected entities, enabling the application of advanced graph algorithms. The key finding indicates that this framework significantly enhances the accuracy, scalability, and transparency of identifying illegitimate publishing practices.
A novel multivariate graph analysis reveals the hidden dynamics of predatory journals, transforming how we detect illegitimate practices in academic publishing.
Predatory journals pose a significant challenge to the integrity of the Open Access (OA) publishing model by exploiting its framework for financial gain while bypassing essential editorial and peer-review standards. This study critically evaluates existing methodologies for identifying such journals, ranging from manual blacklist checks to advanced automated approaches utilizing machine learning. The analysis highlights critical limitations, including the lack of a universally accepted definition of predatory journals, over-reliance on binary classification systems (e.g., blacklists and whitelists), and issues with scalability, reliability and interpretability. To address these shortcomings, this paper introduces a novel methodology based on multivariate graph analysis. By modeling the academic publishing ecosystem as a network of interconnected entities (such as authors, articles, journals, and publishers), this approach provides broader insights into the dynamics of scholarly communication and could help identify illegitimate publishing practices by utilizing graph algorithms like centrality measures, community detection, and anomaly detection. The proposed framework aims to enhance the accuracy, scalability, and transparency of detection of illegitimate journals and publishing practices while fostering a more comprehensive understanding of the academic publishing landscape.
